Grace Bible Church

Preaching the Living Word through the Written Word

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FRUIT OF FOLLOWING GOD’S WILL

(Act 21:10‑15) 03/13/16

Grace Bible Church, Gillette, Wyoming

Pastor Daryl Hilbert

 

I.     REVELATION BY AGABUS (10‑11)

 

A.    [10] A prophet by the name of Agabus arrived in Caesarea. Agabus was the same prophet who prophesied that there would be a great famine in Act 11:28‑29.

1.     On an interesting note, Agabus did not tell the believers how to handle the impending famine; he simply revealed that there would be a famine.

2.     Prophets do not always reveal instruction concerning a prophecy. Sometimes they merely reveal a future event.

3.     It is in this sense that Act 21:4 can be interpreted. The prophets revealed the event of Paul’s persecution through the Spirit, but the instruction forbidding him to go to Jerusalem was most likely their own (cf. Act 21:10‑15).

B.    [11] Agabus, in a manner similar to OT prophets, gave his prophecy through a graphic illustration.

1.     Agabus took Paul’s “belt” (zōnę ‑ cloth or leather band worn around the waist) and bound his “own” (eautou, i.e. Agabus’) feet and hands.

2.     Agabus identified the Holy Spirit as the source of his prophecy (“the Holy Spirit says” cf. Act 1:16; 28:25; Heb 3:7; 9:8).

3.     Similar to the messages of OT prophets who usedgraphic illustrations, Agabus’ message was a message of impending suffering and persecution.

a)    The prophet Ahijah tore his new cloak into twelve pieces illustrating the division of Israel’s kingdom (1Ki 11:29‑39).

b)    The prophet Isaiah was instructed to remove his outer garments and shoes from his feet for three years to illustrate the humiliation being brought upon Egypt by the Assyrians (Isa 20:2‑6).

c)     Jeremiah was told to buy a new waistband and put it in the Euphrates as an illustration of the deterioration of Judah’s pride (Jer 13:1‑11).

4.     Paul was going to be persecuted by the Jews and delivered into the hands of Gentiles at Jerusalem. This will indeed be fulfilled later in this chapter (Act 21:27, 31, 33).

a)    This prophecy about Paul was similar to the prophecy concerning Christ (Mat 20:19; Mar 10:33).

b)    However, Agabus’ prophecy was not about Paul’s death; rather it was about the impending persecution in his ministry.

 

II.    REACTION OF THE BRETHREN (12)

 

A.    Since Agabus’ prophecy was a familiar theme in Paul’s ministry already (Act 9:16; 20:23; 21:4), the prophecy was most likely given for the sake of the church rather than for Paul. This was evidenced by the reaction of the saints and Paul’s response.

B.    The reaction came from the “local residents” at Caesarea as well as from Paul’s companions (“we” included Luke himself).

C.    Their reaction was to “beg” (parakaleō ‑ exhort) Paul not to go to Jerusalem. Motivated by the fear for Paul’s safety, they could not keep silent.

D.    In all reality, they did not understand God’s will nor did they did not understand what they were saying and doing to Paul. Though the reaction of the saints that were with Paul was understandable and well‑meaning but obviously wrong.

 

III.  RESPONSE OF PAUL (13)

 

A.    Paul’s response to his companions and the local believers was an amazing reflection of the apostle’s heart.

B.    The phrase, “what are you doing?” was a strong emotional protest by Paul. They were obviously tearing his heart, testing his loyalty between his God and his beloved companions.

C.    Those with Paul were not only appealing to him but they were emotional in their appeal. They were “weeping” which is the Greek word klaiō and means not only shedding tears, but could also include any external expression of grief (Mat 26:75; Joh 11:31).

D.    In essence, they were “breaking his heart.” The idea of “breaking” (sunthruptō) is to crumble, crush, or break into pieces. Their weeping appeals were tempting Paul to become disheartened in determination and weakened in courage. But in the end, beloved in the Lord or not, he would have none of their emotional appeals.

E.    For in Paul’s heart of hearts he was ready not only to be bound, but even die at Jerusalem if it was God’s will. There was obviously nothing that Paul would not do or nothing he would not endure for the will, sake, and name of the Lord Jesus. That was the true motive behind his fearlessness to do God’s will.

 

IV.  RESULT OF PAUL’S FEARLESSNESS (14‑15)

 

A.    [14] What was the outcome of all of the attempts to persuade Paul from going to Jerusalem? Paul refused to be persuaded and they could not persuade him.

B.    The first result of Paul’s resolve and fearlessness was they stopped trying to persuade Paul and “fell silent” (hęsuchazō – be quiet, keep calm). In other words, there was nothing more to be said.

C.    The second result was that they committed the matter to God’s will, “The will of the Lord be done.” In a manner of speaking, they consigned themselves to the fact that if Paul could not be persuaded, then it must be God’s will for him to go to Jerusalem.

D.    [15] The third result was that if it was God’s will for Paul to go to Jerusalem, and they were his companions, it must be God’s will for them to go to Jerusalem also.

E.    If Paul was disobedient in going to Jerusalem, then his companions with him became disobedient as well. But that is not the correct way of looking at this event. It was God’s will for Paul to go to Jerusalem (Act 19:21; 20:22). In fact, the Lord Himself confirmed that it was His will for Paul to go to Jerusalem (cf. Act 23:11).

F.     A major result of Paul’s fearlessness in pursuing God’s will was that it strengthened those around Paul to also do God’s will. In fact, even more saints joined the missionary entourage (cf. Act 21:16a).

 

V.    OBSERVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS

 

A.    Fearlessness in God’s will

1.     In God’s will, Paul was able to obey knowing it was for the will, sake, and name of the Lord Jesus.

2.     In God’s will, Paul was safer in it then out of it.

3.     In God’s will, Paul was wiser to reject the exhortations of the brethren than to reject God's will.

4.     In God’s will, Paul was a better example to the brethren by rejecting them instead of heeding them.

5.     In God's will, God’s will for Paul became God's will for the brethren.

B.    Fearlessness of Paul (Php 1:20)

1.     Jesus (Mat 16:21‑26; Luk 9:51; Mat 26:51‑54; Heb 12:2)

2.     Luther – “on the way to the Diet of Worms. Spalatin begged Luther not to go on. Luther said: Though devils be as many in Worms as tiles upon the roofs, yet thither will I go

3.     Anyone who wants to accomplish something for God must be fearless and undaunted in pursuing God’s will.

C.    Fearlessness and Prayer

1.     In that epistle, he exhorted the Christians in Rome to pray to God on his behalf. He asked them to pray that he might be rescued from the unbelievers in Judea and that his service to the saints in Jerusalem might be acceptable. And he expected that in answer to this prayer he might visit the church in Rome (Rom. 15:30‑32). Paul, then, trusted that the prayers of the saints would be answered and that the Holy Spirit would guide him through the difficulties he was about to face. In faith, he accepted the words of the Spirit spoken by Agabus as a detailed revelation of future events. BAK.

 

 

 

 

 

Grace Bible Church · 4000 E. Collins Rd ·  PO Box #3762 · Gillette, WY · (307) 686-1516