Home

 Services

 Location

 Ministries

 Beliefs

 Studies

 Calendar

 Missions

 Pastor

 Contact

 Search

 

 

 

 

Grace Bible Church

4000 E. Collins Rd.   P.O. Box #3762   Gillette, WY  82717   (307) 686-1516

 

- Preaching the Living WORD through the Written WORD - 2 Tim 4:2 -

 

 

 

 

“THE LOST TOMB OF JESUS” AND THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST

 (Mark 16:6) 4/8/07

Grace Bible Church, Gillette, Wyoming

Pastor Daryl Hilbert

 

I.     “THE LOST TOMB OF JESUS” AND THE FAITH

 

A.    On February 26, 2007, filmmakers and researchers unveiled two ancient stone boxes they claim may have once contained the remains of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. On Sunday, March 4, 2007, "The Lost Tomb of Jesus," produced by Oscar-winning director James Cameron aired nationwide on the Discovery Channel. A related book by Simcha Jacobovici and Charles Pellegrino entitled The Jesus Family Tomb: The Discovery, the Investigation, and the Evidence That Could Change History (Harper Collins) released the day of the press conference to coordinate with the special. (Ankerberg and Burroughs, Nine Facts That Disapprove the Discovery Channel’s The Lost Tomb of Jesus)

B.    These researchers argue that 10 small caskets discovered in 1980 in a Jerusalem suburb may have held the bones of Jesus and his family. They even claim that one of the caskets bears the title, "Judah, son of Jesus," hinting that Jesus may have had a son. But what truth can be found in this story?  This is not a question of what are the chances of finding another tomb in the Jerusalem area with these same names but what are the chances of the people in this tomb not being the biblical family of Jesus? (ibid.)

C.    The truth is that several unsupportable assumptions have been made to provide maximum hype for the book and television event. (ibid.)

D.    Theological Ramifications

 

1.     If Jesus’ bones were found in an ossuary in Jerusalem, then Jesus did not have a bodily resurrection (even if one claims Jesus had a spiritual resurrection).

2.     If Jesus did not have a bodily resurrection, then the Scripture’s account of Jesus is inaccurate.

3.     If the Scripture’s account of Jesus is inaccurate, then Jesus was not the Son of God (Rom 1:2), and the Scripture’s account of our resurrection is also inaccurate.

 

II.    “THE LOST TOMB OF JESUS” AND THE REAL TOMB

 

A.    The Body

 

1.     How would the disciples manage to steal the body in the first place? There were guards posted by the grave to prevent the body from being taken (Mat 27:64-66).

2.     When the body came up missing, either the disciples were able to overpower the trained Roman guards or Christ was raised from the dead.

3.     The guards knew what happened because not only did they fall prostrate in fear (Mat 28:2-4), but they also took bribes from the chief priests to spread the rumor that the disciples stole the body (Mat 28:11-15).

 

B.    The Real Tomb

 

1.     The real tomb in which Jesus was buried was the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea (Mat 27:57-60).

2.     If Jesus’ body were to be buried in a family ossuary, it would have been in Nazareth, not Jerusalem.

3.     Incidentally, if the disciples wanted to keep the body hidden in order to promote the false belief of a bodily resurrection, they probably would not have hidden it in Jesus’ family ossuary.

4.     The whole significance of an empty tomb was evidence of Christ’s resurrection (Mar 16:6).

 

C.    The Name “Jesus”

 

1.     The name that was on the ossuary was, “Jesus.” Yet in the Scriptures, because there were many with the same name, Jesus was frequently called, “Jesus of Nazareth,” distinguishing him from all others (Mat 26:71; Luk 18:37; Joh 1:45; Act 10:38; 26:9).

2.     So many were there named, “Jesus” that the name was, discovered on 121 other tombs and ossuaries during this time period (ibid).

a)    This indicates that of all existing tombs and ossuaries of the period, that there is nearly a 1 in 20 (4.6%) chance that any male tomb would have the name Jesus on it.

b)    Yet according to the film’s statistics, the evidence is 600 to 1 in favor of their story being true. (ibid.)

 

D.    The Name “Mary”

 

1.     The name Mariamne (Miriam), a variation of Mary, was found on the same ossuary.

2.     However, not only was this a common name, but one of the most popular names of that time. Even the Bible gives a total of six different Marys.

a)    21% of Jewish women were called Mariamne (Mary).

b)    This is hardly strong evidence suggesting Mary as the Mary Magdalene of the New Testament. (ibid.)

3.     From this assumption, they deduce that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene. A fact which is not supported by the Scriptures, not to mention extra-biblical sources, or even Leonardo Da Vinci’s Last Supper.

 

E.    Conclusion

 

1.     "The claim that the burial site [of Jesus] has been found is not based on any proof, and is only an attempt to sell," says Israeli archeologist Professor Amos Kloner."

2.     A similar film was released 11 years ago, and Kloner said that this current film was merely a renewed effort to create controversy in the Christian world in order to make a bigger profit. He added, "I refute all their claims and efforts to waken a renewed interest in the findings. With all due respect, they are not archeologists." (ibid).

 

III.  “THE LOST TOMB OF JESUS” AND THE RESURRECTION

 

A.    Spiritual Resurrection

 

1.     Several have tried to defend both the film and Christianity by arguing that Christ was resurrected spiritually and not bodily. This way, Christians can have their resurrection and the filmmakers can have their bones.

2.     In a panel discussion with Ted Koppel, James Tabor, a consultant to the film and head of the religion department at the University of North Carolina-Charlotte, stated in U.S. News & World Report that even New Testament writings open up the question to debate. The apostle Paul, for example, refers in one of his letters to two kinds of bodies, physical and spiritual. One might affirm the Resurrection in a more spiritual way, Tabor says.

 

B.    Bodily Resurrection

 

1.     The believer’s basis for belief is the Scriptures. The Scriptures teach the bodily resurrection of Christ in the OT (Psa 16:10-11), in Christ’s teaching (Joh 2:19-22; Luk 24:25-27), and in the apostles’ writings who were witnesses of Christ’s resurrection (Luk 24:39-46).

2.     It is also through Christ’s bodily resurrection that believer’s base their own hope for a bodily resurrection (Phil 3:21; 1Co 15:42-44).

a)    "To lack a bodily resurrection teaching is to teach in distinction from what the earliest church had received as a key element of the hope that Jesus left his followers, a hope that itself was rooted in Jewish precedent.

b)    Paul, our earliest witness to testify to this in writings we possess, was a former Pharisee who held to a physical resurrection as 1 Corinthians 15 also makes clear… He explicitly denies an approach that accepts only a spiritual resurrection." (Darrell Bock, Hollywood Hype: The Oscars and Jesus’ Family Tomb, What Do They Share?)

 

IV.  PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS

 

A.    If the bones in the ossuary documented by, The Lost Tomb of Jesus, are those of Jesus of Nazareth, then as Paul states, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins (1Co 15:17).

B.    However, just as Paul continues, but now Christ has been raised from the dead, (1Co 15:20), believer’s will have a full redemption and their bodies will not remain in the tomb (Joh 5:28-29).

C.    The false assumptions of, The Lost Tomb of Jesus, are answered by the angel who said, Do not be amazed; you are looking for Jesus the Nazarene, who has been crucified. He has risen; He is not here; behold, here is the place where they laid Him (Mar 16:6).

 

 

 

Return to Easter 07