Home

Services

Location

Beliefs

Sermons & Studies

Bible Institute

Calendar

Missions

Pastor

Contact

Search

Weather

 

 

 

Grace Bible Church

4000 E. Collins Rd.   P.O. Box #3762   Gillette, WY  82717   (307) 686-1516

 

“Preaching the Living Word through the Written Word (2Tim 4:2)”

 

 

 

SOVEREIGN ELECTION AND THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MAN

 (Rom 9:19-23)    6/8/08

Grace Bible Church, Gillette, Wyoming

Pastor Daryl Hilbert

 

I.        GOD’S SOVEREIGN ELECTION DOES NOT NULLIFY MAN’S RESPONSIBILITY (19)

 

A.      The concepts of the Sovereignty of God and the Responsibility of Man have been contemplated by theologians for centuries. However, Paul teaches us that the Sovereignty of God in no way nullifies the Responsibility of Man.

1.       Paul responds with a diatribe to the previous conclusion, “So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires (18 cp. 15-18).

a)       The question refers to the universal question, “If God sovereignly elects, then why does God still hold man responsible?”

b)       At first glance, God’s election does not seem fair and man wonders why God “finds fault” (mémphomai - blame or accuse) with man if he cannot “resist” (anthístêmi - set against or withstand) God’s will (boúlêma - sometimes used of God’s Decretive Will as opposed to His Preceptive Will).

2.       The idea of the sovereignty of God co-existing with the responsibility of man is a biblical concept.

a)       For instance, in Lk 22:22, Jesus speaks of both the sovereignty of God (“has been determined”) and the responsibility of man (“woe to that man by whom He is betrayed”). Christ’s death was predestined by God’s sovereignty and yet at the same time, Judas was responsible for the sin of betraying the Son of Man (cp. Ac 2:23).

b)       Why should God be charged with injustice if He chooses to accomplish His will through the sinful actions of man (cp. Ge 50:20)?

c)       It is a testimony to God’s wisdom that He is able to bring about His will through evil men who reject Him.

d)       Furthermore, man is sinful in and of his own accord, and judgment comes upon him as a consequence of his own sinfulness (Ro 6:23).

e)       If man were to demand total justice upon the human race then the entire human race would be justly punished.

f)        God’s sovereign election is God’s mercy upon sinful man as well as the only means anyone is saved.

B.      In vss. 20-23, Paul will strongly argue that God is sovereign in His election and it does not nullify man’s responsibility and accountability before a holy God.

 

II.      GOD’S SOVEREIGN ELECTION CANNOT BE QUESTIONED BY MAN (20)

 

A.      The response to the question in vs. 19 is that God and His sovereign election cannot be questioned by man. Because of man’s humble estate and lowly position, he has no right to question God.

1.       Paul begins with the strong expression, “on the contrary” (ménounge) to the notion that God unjustly finds fault with man.

2.       He questions the man, “who are you” that he would question God (antapokrínomai - contradict, dispute, i.e. talk back). Man is but dust and has no right to question his Creator or His integrity (Ge 2:7; 18:27; Ec 3:20).

3.       It would be ludicrous for the “molded thing” to berate its “molder” (plássō - to mold, Eng. plastic) for making it the way he did.

B.      No man has the right to question God’s sovereign election in a disrespectful and judgmental manner.

 

III.   GOD’S SOVEREIGN ELECTION IS GOD’S SOVEREIGN RIGHT (21)

 

A.      Paul uses the analogy of the potter in order to show that God’s sovereign election is God’s sovereign right.

1.       Not only was Israel familiar with analogies of the potter (Is 29:16; 45:9), but the violation of personal rights produce a universal emotional response.

2.       In addition, the potter has the right (exousía - authority, power to act) to make and use the clay for whatever uses he desire. Those uses can either be “honorable” (timế - respectable or valuable) or dishonorable (from timế but with a negative - dishonorable or common).

B.      The very definition of sovereignty, when applied to God, means that God has the position and the power to do as He pleases in all matters, including election.

 

IV.    GOD’S SOVEREIGN ELECTION IS NOT DOUBLE PREDESTINATION (22)

 

A.      One misnomer concerning election is that it subscribes to what is called “Double Predestination.” Double Predestination is the view that God sovereignly chooses the elect to be saved and chooses the non-elect to be damned.

1.       Calvin nor the historical view of Predestination taught that God chose the non-elect to go to Hell.

2.       In vs. 20, the potter uses vessels from the same lump. In man’s case, although his lump was created innocent, Adam sinned and the whole lump of mankind became sinful (Ro 5:12 cp. Ro 3:23).

3.       Therefore, God’s sovereign election was His choice to predestine for salvation some from among sinful humanity. He passively passed over the rest, but He did not predestine the rest for destruction. Ro 9:22 is sometimes used to teach Double Predestination, but it is done with a misunderstanding of the verse.

a)       The uses of the expression, “what if”, is intended to open man’s mind to the idea of God’s sovereign election.

b)       Paul writes that there are “vessels of wrath” that have been “prepared for destruction.” But the Greek shows that “prepared” (katartízō - complete) is a perfect participle which implies that is was not God who prepared them at a point in time as He did the “vessels of mercy” (cp. vs. 23, “prepared” is an aorist active indicative of proetoimázō - prepare before). Rather, they (lit.) “have prepared and continue to prepare” themselves by their own sinfulness for the wrath of God (cp. Ro 1:18; 2:5; 1Th 2:16).

B.      The word “predestination” in the Bible is only used in connection with the elect and not the non-elect. The doctrine of God’s sovereign election only includes the elect and therefore is not Double Predestination.

 

V.      GOD’S SOVEREIGN ELECTION DEMONSTRATES GOD’S GLORY (23)

 

A.      God accomplishes all things for His own glory, and His sovereign election is no exception.

1.       Paul writes that the reason God extended mercy upon the vessels of mercy was to make known the “riches (ploútos - wealth and abundance) of His glory (attributes).”

2.       We also see God’s glory in vs. 22, where God is long-suffering even to those who reject Christ.

3.       However, God will be glorified when He brings wrath upon the vessels of wrath (Pr 16:4). His holiness and righteousness will be exalted and the elect will truly understand that grace is “God’s riches at Christ’s expense.”

4.       Not only are the elect spared from wrath because of salvation in Christ (Ro 8:1), but they are destined and predestined for glory (Ro 8:18).

B.      In reality, God is glorified in His sovereign election by extending mercy on the vessels of mercy and He glorified in demonstrating wrath upon those who have rejected Christ.

 

VI.    OBSERVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS

 

A.      God’s Sovereign Election is for Nations and Individuals

B.      God’s Sovereign Election Insists on Preaching Man’s Responsible and Grace

C.      God’s Sovereign Election Guarantees Salvation

D.      God’s Sovereign Election Does Not Exclude Faith