|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION TO 2 PETER (Intro)
9/14/16 Grace Bible Church,
Gillette, Wyoming Pastor Daryl Hilbert I. RECIPIENTS A. Unlike Peter’s first
epistle, he did not immediately identify his readers (cf. 1Pe 1:1). It
appeared to be a general audience of, “those who have received a faith of the
same kind as ours, by the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ”
(2Pe 1:1). B. However in 2Pe 3:1 Peter wrote, “this is
now my second letter to you.” The normal understanding would be that this was
the same group that Peter had written in his first epistle. C. Therefore, just like 1 Peter, Peter’s
audience was both Jewish and Gentile Christians. II. OCCASION FOR WRITING A. Peter wrote in his first
epistle to believers experiencing persecution in varying degrees. He exhorted
them to stand firm because God was sovereign, God was being glorified, and
God’s will was being accomplished, and they were called to suffer and follow
Christ’s example. B. In his second epistle, Peter was warning
believers concerning false teachers creeping into the church. He was doing
this especially in light of his impending martyrdom (2Pe 1:14). C. He does not identify the specific heresy
and it does not have the traits of Gnosticism. But he does give a description
of the false teachers. 1. They
“introduced destructive heresies” (2Pe 2:1a), 2. “Denied the Master who bought them” (2Pe
2:1b), 3. Were greedy (2Pe 2:3, 14), 4. “Indulged in the flesh” (2Pe 2:10a), 5. “Reviled angelic majesties” (2Pe 2:10b), 6. Spoke arrogantly (2Pe 2:18), 7. Led others into bondage (2Pe 2:19-22), 8. Mocked the 2nd Coming of
Christ (2Pe 3:4), 9. Mocked the coming Judgment (2Pe 3:5-7). III. AUTHOR AND AUTHORSHIP A. Peter 1. By
the time Peter wrote his second epistle, he most definitely was one of the
church’s preeminent leaders. That was why Christ stated that Peter was “petros,”
a large rock, symbolizing his leadership (Mat 16:18a). However, he was not
the “rock” (petra, large cliff) that the church was built upon (Mat
16:18b). That was the statement, “You are the Christ, the Son of God (Mat
16:16). Knowing that his days were coming to an end, Peter wanted to assure
that false teachers would not creep in and destroy the church he gave loving
leadership. 2. Peter was one of the eye-witnesses of
Christ’s Transfiguration, when Christ’s glory could not be contained in His
flesh (Mt 17:1-9 cf. 2Pe 1:16-17). Therefore,
Peter was a first-hand witness of Christ’s “majesty,” and knew the person of
Christ. Peter was in the vicinity when Jesus died on the cross. Therefore,
Peter knew of the work of Christ. Peter himself heard the attestation of the
voice of the Father say, “This is My beloved Son with whom I am
well-pleased.” Therefore Peter knew that Jesus was the Son of God. 3. Peter was also a witness of the
resurrected Christ and was commissioned by Him to be an apostle (Joh
21:15-17; Ac 1:8, 22; 2:32; 3:15; 5:32; 10:39,
41). 4. Peter understood the concept of the
inspiration of Scripture from the Old Testament and now he himself was an
inspired writer (cf. 2Pe 1:20-21) as was Paul (2Pe 3:15-16). The definition
of Scripture (graphê) means that it is God’s very words. The Holy
Spirit “moved” (pherō) God’s spokesmen to speak and write from
God. Therefore, no one is permitted to take their own interpretations from
Scripture. God gave His intended meaning. B. Objections to Peter’s
Authorship 1. No other
New Testament epistle has received such scrutiny concerning its canonicity
than has Peter’s second epistle. 2. Some books were accepted by all and were
called the Homologoumena. Some books were rejected by all and they
were called the Pseudepigrapha. However, there were some books that
were undecided upon and disputed over concerning their authenticity. They
were called the Antilegomena. 2Peter was among this last list. 3. Eusebius, the church historian (A.D.
260-340), wrote that Peter’s first epistle was accepted but his second
epistle “we have been informed by tradition, has not been received as a part
of the New Testament” (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, lib. ii.c.3) 4. The fact that some church fathers (Tertullian, Cyprian. Clement of Alexandria,
Muratori’s Canon) did not mention any verses from
Peter’s second epistle, caused some to be skeptical. 5. Jerome included 2Peter in the Latin
Vulgate but maintained that many questioned Peter’s authorship because of “a difference in style from 1 Peter.” 6. External Evidence - However, there were early traces of 2 Peter in other
early church fathers. a) “They have left their true way” cf. 2Pe 2:15 (Hermas, A.D. 140 author of the Shepherd of Hermas,
Vision 3:7). Also 2Pe 2:13, 20. b) “The Lord making it known that he does not
abandon those that trust in Him, but appoints those otherwise inclined to
Judgment” cf. 2Pe. 2:5-9 (Clement of
Rome, A.D. 96, Epistle to the Corinthians ). c) “The day of the Lord is as a thousand
years” cf. 2Pe 3:8 (Justin Martyr, A.D. 100-65). 7. Internal
Evidence a) Peter’s
name and title had a direct claim of authorship (2Pe 1:1 cf. 1Pe 1:1). b) He stated that he had already written to
his readers (2Pe 3:1). c) He stated that he along with others
(“we”) witnessed Christ’s transfiguration (2Pe 1:16-18). d) He stated that his martyrdom was coming
soon (2Pe 1:13-14). 8. Stylistic
Evidence – There are numerous “pet” words that
were used in both epistles. a) “Precious”
(timê or timios) in 1Pe 1:19; 2:7 cf. 2Pe 1:4. b) “Excellence” (aretê) in 1Pe 2:9 cf.
2Pe 1:3, 5. c) “Apothesis” only used twice in NT,
once in 1Pe 3:21 (“removal”) and once in 2Pe 1:14 (“laying aside”). d) Peter’s greetings were the same, “charis
umin kai eirênê plêthuntheiê” in 1Pe 1:2 (“grace and peace be yours in
the fullest measure”) and 2Pe 1:2 (“Grace and peace be multiplied to you”). e) The similarities in style between the two
books are just as striking as the differences. Both books are filled with
hapax legomena, words that occur only once in the New Testament. Of the 686
hapax legomena in the New Testament, 1 Peter contains 62 and 2 Peter has
54more, proportionately, than most New Testament books their size (Homer K. Ebright, The Petrine Epistles). f) Stylistic differences could have come
from a different amanuensis. “Silvanus” was Peter’s amanuensis in 1Pe 5:12.
Either a different amanuensis or Peter himself physically wrote his second
epistle. g) Several words used in Peter’s sermons in
Acts are repeated only in 2 Peter. (1) “Punish”
(kolazō) in Act 4:21 and 2Pe 2:9. (2) Act 1:18 (misthou tês adikias) and
2Pe 2:15 (misthon adikias) h) Both
epistles speak of the Lord’s Second Coming. In his first epistle, Peter
encouraged suffering Christians with the Second Coming. However, in his
second epistle, Peter warned false teachers concerning judgment when the Lord
returns. This explains some of the difference in aspects of the Second
Coming. IV. DATE AND PLACE OF WRITING A. Nero died in A.D. 68.
Tradition records that Peter was put to death by Nero in Rome. Since by his
own comment in 2Pe 1:14, Peter’s death was “imminent,” it is generally
accepted that Peter was put to death in 67 or 68. B. Most likely, Peter was imprisoned before
his martyrdom. It is quite possible then that Peter wrote his second epistle
from prison in Rome. V. THEOLOGICAL THEMES A. God’s truth is gained by
the knowledge of Christ in His Word. 1. The word
“know” or “knowledge” is used some 16 times in this epistle. 2. It comes the Greek word gnosis
which refers to God’s knowledge (Rom 11:33; 2Pe 2:9), man’s intellectual
comprehension of things (2Pe 3:3; 2Pe 2:21 “epignōskō” “full
knowledge”), and the knowledge of Christ revealed in His Word (2Co 4:6;
2Pe 1:2, 3, 8; 2:20; 3:18). B. Sufficiency of Divine
Promises (God’s Word) (2Pe 1:3-4) 1. Peter
began his epistle showing that God’s Word is sufficient for everything the
believer needs “pertaining to life and godliness.” 2. Like false teachers today, the false
teachers of Peter’s day may have been teaching that the Scriptures were not
enough for the Christian. He needed other sources of knowledge to meet his
needs. C. Christian Virtues For the
Believer (2Pe 1:5-9) 1. The
believer is indwelt by the Holy Spirit and gave him a new nature. 2. That Holy Spirit and the new nature
enable the believer to live and grow in Christian life and its virtues. 3. These Christian virtues will keep the
believer from becoming “useless and unfruitful.” D. Inspiration of Scripture
(2Pe 1:20-21) 1. Peter
understood what the inspiration of Scripture means. He answered the question
of how can a mere man write God’s Word. 2. The answer is that it is the ministry of
the Holy Spirit to “move” (pherō) God’s chosen men to speak (and
write) from God. 3. Therefore, the Bible is “God-breathed” (theopneustos,
2Ti 3:16), which means it originated from God, not “by an act of human
will.” E. Destiny of False Teachers 1. The word
“destruction” or “destroy” is used some 11 times. Because they reject Christ
(2Pe 2:1b), and teach “destructive” heresies, leading others into error, they
will bring swift “destruction” upon themselves (2Pe 2:1c). 2. One of the Greek words used, particularly
in the “destruction” of the false teachers, is apōleia, which
means the eternal punishment of the wicked (2Pe 2:1, 3; 3:7, 16). F. Second Coming of Christ 1. Peter
teaches the doctrine of the Second Coming of Christ. 2. The false teachers and mockers are
sarcastic concerning Christ’s coming (2Pe 3:3-4). 3. Peter gives arguments for why Christ has
not yet come, specifically, the Lord’s longsuffering results in the salvation
of men (2Pe 3:5-13). 4. Christ’s Second Coming should be a
motivation for believers to live spotless and blameless lives (2Pe 3:14-16). G. God’s Truth Against False
Teachers 1. Besides
the fact that Peter warned of the reality of false teachers (2Pe 2:1), the
description of false teachers (2Pe 2:2-3, 10-19), and the diagnosis of false
teachers (2Pe 2:4-9), Peter showed that God’s truth guards against false
teachers. 2. Therefore, one of the theological themes
is found in the key verses 2Pe 3:17-18 which reads, “You therefore, beloved,
knowing this beforehand, be on your guard so that you are not carried away by
the error of unprincipled men and fall from your own steadfastness, but grow
in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him be the
glory, both now and to the day of eternity. Amen” 3. By “knowing [these truths, the ones
expounded upon in this epistle] beforehand” the believer will be on guard
against doctrinal error. 4. Instead of falling into error and falling
away from the Lord, the believer is to grow in truth, namely the “grace and
knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.” VI. OUTLINE (Key Verse: 2Pe 3:17-18) GOD’S TRUTH AGAINST
FALSE TEACHERS I. GOD’S
TRUTH ESTABLISHES THE BELIEVER (1:1-21) A. Salutation
(1:1-2) B. Efficacy of Divine Promises (1:3-4) C. Excellencies For the Believer (1:5-9) D. Eternal Calling Made Certain (1:10-11) E. Established by the Truth (1:12-15) – KEY
VERSE (2Pe 1:12) F. Eyewitness of Christ’s Majesty (1:16-19) G. Exaltation of Scripture (1:20-21) II. GOD’S
TRUTH EXPOSES FALSE TEACHERS (2:1-22) A. Dictum on
False Teachers (2:1) – KEY VERSE (2Pe 2:1) B. Description of False Teachers (2:2-3) C. Diagnosis of False Teachers (2:4-9) D. Description (Further) of False Teachers
(2:10-19) E. Destiny of False Teachers (2:20-22) III. GOD’S
TRUTH ENSURES AGAINST FALSE TEACHING (3:1-18) A. Stirred
Up Remembrances (3:1-2) B. Sarcasm Against the 2nd Coming
(3:3-4) C. Statements For the 2nd Coming
(3:5-13) D. Standard Because of the 2nd
Coming (3:14-16) E. Safeguard Against False Teaching (3:17) –
KEY VERSES (2Pe 3:17-18) F. Benediction (3:18). |
|
|
|
Grace Bible Church · 4000 E. Collins Rd · PO Box #3762 · Gillette, WY · (307) 686-1516 |
|
|
|
|
|