|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
CASE AGAINST PAUL BEFORE FELIX (Acts 24:1-9) 06/12/16 Grace Bible Church,
Gillette, Wyoming Pastor Daryl Hilbert I. FELIX THE PROCONSUL (Ac 23:33 – Ac 24:1) A. Felix Received the Letter from the
Soldiers (33) B. Felix Agreed to Hear the Case (34) C. Felix Allowed Paul to stay in the
Praetorium (35) D. Ananias & Tertullus travel to Caesarea
(1) 1. Five days was a relatively short time to assemble
the priests as well as a lawyer in order to appear before Felix. They were
unwilling to have this trial dismissed. 2. Ananias the high priest, the one who had Paul struck on the
face, came with them (Act 23:1-2). 3. Tertullus,
was introduced by Luke as an attorney. The Greek word is rêtōr
from which we get our English word rhetoric or rhetorician. It means an
orator in court, an advocate or attorney. 4. These attorneys were familiar with Roman Law as well as the
judicial manner of making arguments and the skillful manipulation of half-truths. II. TERTULLUS THE PROSECUTOR A. Tertullus Began with Flattery for Felix
(2) 1. It was normal in ancient trials as well
as modern day trials to begin with a respectable address to the Judge.
However, Tertullus does so with great exaggeration. 2. First he praised Felix for the
attainments of peace called “reforms” during his rule for both
Jews and Romans. 3. The problem was that Felix brought more
instability than peace. Felix instituted a forceful peace by strict measures
against both guilty and innocent individuals, punishing “a multitude not to be enumerated” (Josephus, Wars of the Jews). 4. Though he brought some peace through
ceaseless warfare against the Sicarii, “he was more hurtful than them all”
(Tacitus). In fact, he had some of these assassins on his payroll and at his
instigation; they murdered the high priest Jonathon in the Temple. B. Tertullus Openly Compliments Felix (3) 1. Tertullus thanked Felix, the “most
excellent”, for all that he had accomplished in every way and everywhere.
Outside of Felix’s warfare against the Sicarii, history has failed to mention
all (or anything) that Felix had accomplished. 2. The Sanhedrin must have truly desired
Paul’s conviction to be able to sit through all the layers of rhetorical
smoke. C. Tertullus Attempted not to Weary Felix (4) 1. In a bit of common rhetorical artwork,
Tertullus grants Felix the humility of not being wearied by hearing all his
accolades. Perhaps the Sanhedrin could bear it no longer. 2. Nevertheless, Tertullus introduced his
case informing Felix it was going to be brief, cut, and dried. D. Accusation #1 – Sedition (5a) 1. Tertullus’ first accusation against Paul
was the crime of sedition. The indictment of sedition was a serious crime. It
was called “Treason” and was included in Table 9 of the “Twelve Tables” of
Roman Law. Sedition was the incitement of rebellion against Rome and its
citizens. 2. Tertullus stated that Paul was a “real
pest.” Unfortunately, the NASB does not capture the full meaning of the
word. The KJV comes closer in this instance being translated “a pestilent
fellow” or the ESV as “a plague.” The Greek word is loimos and
literally means a dangerous plague or disease, i.e. pestilence. In reference
to a person, it means he is dangerous to public welfare and a menace to
society. 3. Paul was accused of stirring up
dissension. “Dissension” was (stasis - stand) taking a position or
stand of rebellion and insurrection. Incidentally, the insurrectionist named
Barabbas was preferred and released over Jesus (Mar 15:7). 4. The apostles were careful to teach
believers not to be guilty of insurrection but to be model citizens (Rom
13:1-7; 1Pe 2:13-15). E. Accusation #2 – Sectarianism (5b) 1. Tertullus’ second accusation was that
Paul was guilty of Sectarianism, causing violence between sects or group
(“sect” of the Nazarenes vs. Jewish people) 2. In this case, Paul was accused of
stirring up “all the Jews through the world.” There could have been
something to this accusation had Tertullus brought evidence of all the trouble
Paul had caused throughout Asia Minor. 3. However, had Tertullus brought evidence
from another province, Felix would have sent Paul’s case to another
jurisdiction. In all reality, Paul simply preached the Gospel but it was the
Jews that became insolent at the message. 4. Paul was identified as the “ringleader”
(prōtostatês – stands first, leader) of the Nazarenes.
Christians were called “Nazarenes” because they were followers of Christ the
“Nazarene” (Mat 2:23; Mar 10:47). But it was also a pejorative term because
Nazareth was seen as a despicable place (Joh 1:46 cf. Luk 1:26-27). F. Accusation #3 – Sacrilege (6) 1. Tertullus’ third accusation against Paul
was that of “Sacrilege” for desecrating the Temple. 2. Tertullus’ case was that Paul violated Roman
Law and Jewish Law, in regard to the Temple. They accused Paul of bringing
Trophimus, a Gentile, into the Temple (cf. Act 21:27-29).They desired to have
Paul back in their own Jewish Court to sentence him to death. 3. Desecration of the Temple is the one law
in which the Romans allowed the Jews to carry out the death penalty. A sign
on the gates of the Temple stated that any Gentiles who entered were
responsible for his own death. G. Accusation #4 – Suppression (7-8) 1. Tertullus’ fourth accusation appeared to
have been against the Roman Commander, Claudius Lysias, who suppressed the
Jews from carrying out their own Law. They claimed that Lysias took Paul out
of their custody (7) and ordered the accusers to appear before Felix (8). 2. However, some of the early manuscripts do
not contain the last part of vs. 6, all of vs. 7, and the first part of vs.
8. 3. Whether or not these verses were included
in the original, it once again shows how Tertullus stretched the truth (cf.
Act 21:31-34). H. The Jews affirmed Tertullus’ accusations
(9) 1. Most likely, the Sanhedrin informed
Tertullus of these skewed facts, so of course they were in hearty agreement
with his case. It’s funny how the plot between the Sicarii and the Sanhedrin
never made it into Tertullus’ case. III. OBSERVATIONS AND APPLICATION A. Providence of God – One might
suggest that if God’s providence is at work in Paul’s life, then why does he
have so much trouble. On the other hand, one might answer that God’s
providence is observed in getting Paul out of so much trouble. B. Flattery vs. Encouragement –
Flattery is complimenting someone with selfish motives for something they did
not do. It could also apply to something they did do. Believers are
instructed not to flatter (Job 32:21; Psa 5:9; 1Th 2:4-6). Believers are also
instructed not to be susceptible to flattery (Pro 2:16; 7:5, 21; 29:5; Rom
16:18; Jude 14-16). Encouragement on the other hand, is positive affirmation,
no matter how small, that seeks to edify another (1Th 5:11, 14; Heb 10:24-25;
Rom 15:4-5). C. Jesus is the Believer’s Advocate –
We are taught in Scripture that Jesus is the believer’s Advocate in the event
that the believer sins (1Jo 2:1). “Advocate” is the Greek word paraklêtos
which means one called alongside. Jesus comes alongside the believer with the
defense that He Himself paid for the believer’s sins (1Jo 2:2). The
believer’s Advocate is far greater than a mere rhetorician. |
|
|
|
Grace Bible Church · 4000 E. Collins Rd · PO Box #3762 · Gillette, WY · (307) 686-1516 |
|
|
|
|
|