Home

 Services

 Location

 Ministries

 Beliefs

 Studies

 Calendar

 Missions

 Pastor

 Contact

 Search

 

 

 

Grace Bible Church

4000 E. Collins Rd.   P.O. Box #3762   Gillette, WY  82717   (307) 686-1516

 

- Preaching the Living WORD through the Written WORD - 2 Tim 4;:2 -

 

 

 

 

THE FIRST WARNING TO THE CHURCH

Acts 4:13-23 (8/18/13)

Grace Bible Church, Gillette, Wyoming

Pastor Daryl Hilbert

 

I.     REACTION OF SANHEDRIN (Ac 4:13-14)

 

A.    Their Observations - As the Sanhedrin listened to Peter’s reply (Ac 4:10-12) they made several observations. The first was Peter’s “confidence” (parrēsia - boldness and freedom), with which he was able to speak without fear in their presence. Secondly, they perceived them as “uneducated” and “untrained” men. They thought they were “uneducated” (agrammatos - without higher education) in the sense of being Galileans, who spoke, not in technical vernacular but in everyday language (Ac 2:7-8). They were “untrained” (idiōtēs - unskilled) in the sense that they had not been trained by the tradition of rabbis and religious lawyers.

B.    Their Amazement - Subsequently, they were “amazed” (thaumazō) at the apostle’s knowledge of Scripture but not the apostle’s conclusions on the Scriptures or the Messiah.

C.    Their Recognition of Jesus’ Disciples - It was at that point they made another observation. They recognized that the apostles had been the disciples of Jesus (Jn 18:15-16), who also, according to them, was learned in theological disputations (Jn 7:15, 46 cf. Mt 7:28-29; Mk 1:22; cf. Mt 22:23-33; 34-43) but uneducated in rabbinical school.

D.    This amazement coupled with the fact of the healed cripple left the Sanhedrin with no refutation or reply (“reply”- antilegō - refute or contradict). They were once again befuddled with the powerful truth though they thought they had buried it with Jesus.

 

II.    RESPONSE OF SANHEDRIN (Ac 4:15-18)

 

A.    The Council - Nevertheless, the Sanhedrin had to do something. The Council (sunedrion - “sitting together” - Eng. Sanhedrin) asked the apostles to leave while they “conferred” (sumballō - put (throw) together as in ideas or decisions) together.

B.    The Public Miracle - The question that the Sanhedrin was faced with was what they were going to “do” with these men. On the one hand they did not agree with the apostle’s message, but on the other hand they could not deny that a “noteworthy” (gnōstos - recognizable or publically known) miracle had taken place. The Sanhedrin had missed and rejected the whole point of the divine miracle, which was to give credence to the apostle’s divine message.

C.    The Prohibition - The only concern that the Sanhedrin had was that the apostles’ teaching would not be “spread” (diamenō - circulate or distribute a report) among the people. In essence, they attempted to keep the people from hearing the apostle’s divine message. Therefore, they decided to “warn” (apeilō - to threaten with harm) the apostles not to speak “in this name” or by the authority of Jesus any longer.

D.    In fact, they “commanded” (parannellō - authoritative directive or order) them “not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus.

 

III.  RESPONSE OF APOSTLES (Ac 4:19-20)

 

A.    No Retaliation - The response of Peter and John was an interesting one. They did not retaliate, hurl insults, or even defy the Sanhedrin. Instead, they posed a theological question, which should have been considered by the Sanhedrin originally.

B.    Theological Question - Peter posed the question, “Is it right to obey man rather than God?” He gave the Sanhedrin the freedom to come to their own theological decision, “You judge (aorist active imperative - krinō - judge or decide)” The religious leaders should have had no problem answering this most basic of tenets in Scripture. It had always been a principle in Scripture to obey God rather than man (Ex 1:17; Da 3:17-18; Dan 6:10; Ac 5:29). Ironically, the religious leaders ignored obedience to God and called for obedience to men, i.e. to them. The apostles appealed to God’s higher court as well as exposed the Sanhedrin’s unbiblical prohibition and disobedience to God.

C.    Not Able Not to Speak - Peter added, “for we cannot stop speaking about what we have seen and heard.” Literally, the apostles were “not able not to speak” (ou dunametha lalein). The apostles’ answer was not only the right theological answer, but also an answer for which they had far greater accountability. If the apostles were chosen by God to be His spokesmen, attested by miracles, then to withhold God’s message would carry a far greater accountability for them (1Co 9:16).

D.    Equal to OT Prophets - The apostles were not mere believers wanting to share the gospel; they were equal to or greater than the OT prophets (Ep 4:11). Like the OT prophets, the apostles had been given a divine commission by God (Christ) (Mt 28:18-20; Ac 1:8). Their commission was to bear witness to Christ’s resurrection and speak God’s divine message (1Jn 1:1-3). The apostolic office carried with it a far greater degree of accountability.

E.    For example, we read in the Scriptures about a prophet whose disobedience cost him his life (1Ki 13:24). The illustration from Jonah shows that a prophet cannot thwart God’s will and prophecy (Jon 3:3). In a contrariwise example, Scripture gives an account of a false prophet who attempted to give a false prophecy but was prohibited by God (Nu 22:18; 23:11; 24:10). In another case, Ezekiel was warned to speak to a disobedient people who would not listen to him. If he refused, God would judge him as disobedient like his listeners (Eze 2:7-8).

F.     Civil Disobedience - Note that Peter was not advocating rebellion to the powers that be. In fact, Peter as well as other apostles instructed obedience to civil authorities (1Pe 2:13-17; Ro 13:1-7). But if human authorities demand a violation to explicit principles in Scripture, obedience to God is required.

 

IV.  CONCLUDING EVENTS (Ac 4:21-23)

 

A.    Threatened Further - Obviously, the Sanhedrin was not in agreement with the apostles’ answer. So they “threatened them further” and probably with more intensity. Their threats were aimed at silencing the apostles from teaching in the name of Jesus. The Sanhedrin had no other choice but to let the apostles go. However, this did give the Sanhedrin future legal grounds to arrest them if they continued to speak and teach (cf. Ac 5:28).

B.    Released for Two Reasons - There were two grounds upon which the Sanhedrin released the apostles. First, the Sanhedrin had no legal or religious basis to keep them or punish them. In healing the crippled man, they broke no Roman or Scriptural Law. Secondly, they cowered because of the opinion of the people (which happened to be correct). The people recognized the divine confirmation of the healing of the crippled man. For the crippled man had been with them for over forty years. Furthermore, some of the people had accepted the apostles’ message that Jesus was the Messiah.

C.    Apostles Reported the Events - The apostles were released and went to “their own” (tous idious). This surely means they gathered with the other apostles but it most likely includes a number of the growing assembly of believers, i.e. the church. The concept of reporting to the church will become a theme of the NT church (Ac 14:27; 15:4).

 

V.    OBSERVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS

 

A.    Uneducated Disciples - Though many in the church are not educated in Seminaries, they are trained in the Word of God in the church. One of the purposes of the church is to “equip” (Ep 4:12, katartimos - prepare or train) believers for ministry. Academic achievement does not necessarily equate to spiritual growth and competence.

B.    Had Been with Jesus - Though this phrase refers to an original disciple of Christ, “being with Jesus” is a prerequisite for ministry. Believers will grow and increase in ability to minister spiritually by spending time with Jesus. There is no substitute for personal study in the Word and personal time in prayer. Oh Lord, make it obvious to the world that we “had been with Jesus.”

C.    Civil Disobedience - Though a genuine concept, “civil disobedience” for the believer might be better phrased as “heavenly obedience.” Christians have always been accused of being “rebels” when in reality they were the best citizens. “Heavenly obedience” is not hatred and rebellion. Rather it is love for God and obedience to God’s explicit principles.