|
|
-
Preaching the Living WORD through the Written WORD - 2 Tim 4:2 - |
|
|
A
BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF THE EMERGING CHURCH Pastor I. WHAT IS THE
EMERGING CHURCH? A. It is
difficult to pin down a definition of the 1. They
are not able to clearly define themselves. 2. They have not made up their mind, what to
deconstruct and reconstruct in historical Christianity. 3. They do not know what the final emerging
Christian is supposed to look like. B. Brian McLaren,
emergent networker and author of “A New Kind of Christianity,” says, Right now
Emergent is a conversation, not a movement. We don’t have a program. We don’t
have a model. I think we must begin as a conversation, then grow as a
friendship, and see if a movement comes of it. (Christianity Today, “The Emergent Mystique”) C. Basically, the
emerging church is a postmodern approach to Christianity. 1. What
is postmodernism? Postmodern
thought is, in its very essence, an adventure and an expression of life
experience. From its modernist beginnings, Postmodernism is an attempt to
question the world that we see around us and especially not to take other
people’s views as the final truth. Postmodernism puts everything into
question and radically interrogates philosophies, strategies and world views.
There is no such thing as a definition of the postmodern. It is a mood rather
than a strict discipline. Postmodernism, with all its complexity and possible
excesses, is an attempt to find new and more truthful versions of the world. (www.essortment.com) 2. What
is Postmodernism in Christianity? The modern
period of history… is coming to an end. We are entering “postmodernity,” an
as-yet ill-defined borderland in which central modern values like
objectivity, analysis, and control will become less compelling. They are
superseded by postmodern values like mystery and wonder. The controversial
implication is that forms of Christianity that have thrived in modernity
[including evangelicalism] are unlikely to survive the transition. (McLaren, A New Kind of Christian) II. HOW DID THE
EMERGING CHURCH GET STARTED? A. Though there
are many different voices in the From 1978
to 1986, McLaren taught college English, and in 1982, he helped form B. McLaren is
known through his lectures, writing, and especially 2001 book entitled, “A
New Kind of Christian.” A New Kind
of Christian became influential not just because of its content but also its
form. McLaren cast the book as a story of two friends, a disillusioned
evangelical pastor named Dan Poole and an enigmatic high school science
teacher nicknamed Neo. On the brink of despair with his own ministry, Dan is
led by Neo—who turns out to be a lapsed pastor himself—through a series of
set pieces that introduce the initially skeptical Dan to a “postmodern”
approach to Christianity.
(Crouch, Christianity Today, “The Emergent Mystique”) C. Rob and
Kirsten Bell are perhaps one of the most prolific followers of McLaren.
Raised in traditional evangelical churches, they had their eyes opened while
reading, “A New Kind of Christian.” D. Rob Bell confirms that the This is
not just the same old message with new methods. We’re rediscovering Christianity as an
Eastern religion, as a way of life. (Crouch, Christianity Today, “The Emergent Mystique”) [The III. WHAT DOES THE
EMERGING CHURCH BELIEVE? A. Truth 1. If
defining the 2. The main difficulty is that the
postmodern 3. Propositional truths are truths that are
stated in their simplest forms. Something is either true or false (Formal
Logic’s “Excluded Middle”). a) Logic
is not a philosophy but a proper way of thinking and deriving at the truth
(in propositional truths). This is especially true when deriving
propositional truth from the Scriptures. This has been a hermeneutical
principle of historical orthodox Christianity. The whole
counsel of God, concerning all things necessary for his own glory, man’s
salvation, faith and life, is either expressly set down in Scripture, or by
good and necessary consequence may be deduced from Scripture: unto which nothing at any time is to be
added, whether by new revelations of the Spirit, or traditions of men. ( Reason is
the instrument of discovery of all doctrines and duties, whether ‘expressly
set down in Scripture’ or ‘by good and necessary consequence deduced from
Scripture’: but their authority, when
once discovered, is derived from God, who reveals them and prescribes them in
Scripture, either by literal assertion or by necessary implication. (B.B. Warfield, The Scripture
frequently employs logical devices, such as antithesis, if-then arguments,
syllogisms, and propositions. These are all standard logical forms and
Scripture is full of them. (MacArthur, The Truth War, pg. 14) 4. The
Christian receives his propositional truth from the Scriptures. Those propositional
truths are what is called church dogma. Dogma is a corpus of doctrines
relating to beliefs authoritatively by the historical orthodox church based
on Scripture. 5. If the McLaren
alone has written and co-authored about a dozen books, and his utter contempt
for certainty is a motif he returns to again and again. (MacArthur, The Truth War, pg. x-xi) Ask me if
Christianity (my version of it, yours, the Pope’s, whoever’s) is orthodox,
meaning true, and here’s my honest answer: a little, but not yet. Assuming by Christianity you mean the
Christian understanding of the world and God, Christian opinions on soul,
text, and culture…I’d have to say that we probably have a couple of things
right, but a lot of things wrong, and even more spreads before us unseen and
unimagined. But at least our eyes are
open! To be a Christian in a
generously orthodox way is not to claim to have the truth captured, stuffed,
and mounted on the wall.
(Brian McLaren, A Generous Orthodoxy, p.293) 6. However,
if there is one thing we can be certain about, it is that because God is a
God of truth and Christianity and all its facets are centered around truth. a) There
is no ambiguity in truth, especially the truth of Scripture (1Jo 2:21). b) The Scriptures are truth and reveal God’s
truth (Psa 119:119:160; Joh 17:17). c) The Scriptures exhort the discovery and
the guarding of truth (Pro 23:23). d) God is a God of truth and must be
worshipped in Spirit and in truth (Psa 31:5; Joh 4:24). e) Jesus Christ is unambiguously called the
Truth (Joh 14:6). f) The Holy Spirit is called the “Spirit of
Truth” and guides the believer into truth (Joh 16:13). g) The church is supposed to be the pillar
of truth (1Ti 3:15). h) Believers are characterized by the love of
truth (2Th 2:10). i) Believers are set free by knowing the
truth (Joh 8:32). j) Godless men suppress the truth (Rom
1:18). k) False teachers turn away from the truth
(Tit 1:13-14). l) False teachers will turn the church away
from truth (2Ti 4:3-4). B. Bible 1. Some
in the Rob Bell
celebrates his, discovering the Bible as a human product, rather than the
product of divine fiat. The Bible is still in the center for us, but it’s a
different kind of center. We want to embrace mystery, rather than conquer it.
(Crouch, Andy, Christianity Today, November 2004 (Vol. 48, No. 11), pp.
36ff) Rob’s wife,
Kristen, adds, I grew up thinking that we’ve figured out the Bible,”
Kristen says, “that we knew what it means. Now I have no idea what most of it
means. And yet I feel like life is big again—like life used to be black and
white, and now it’s in color. (ibid) 2. Evidently,
the uncertainty of truth is better and more colorful than the certainty of
God’s truth. Uncertainty has to be better because Brian McLaren does not
support the inerrancy of Scripture but the “inherency” of Scripture. The Bible is
absolutely equivalent to the phrase ‘the Word of God’ as used in the
Bible. Although I do find the term
inerrancy useful… I would prefer to use the term inherency to describe my
view of Scripture.
(McLaren, The Last Word, p. 111) As to what
inherency of Scripture is, Gilley comments, By the use of inherency he is
dusting off the neo-orthodox view of the Scriptures, which taught that the
Bible contains the “word of God” but is not the completed Word of God, for
God’s Word can be found in anything He “inspires.” (Gilley, “The Emerging
Church - Part 3”) 3. When
the Emerging Church Movement rejects the inerrancy of Scripture, the next
logical step is to reject expository teaching. There is
more than one way to ‘kill’ the Bible,” McLaren says. “You can dissect it, analyze it, abstract
it. You can read its ragged stories and ragamuffin poetry, and from them you
can derive neat abstractions, sterile propositions, and sharp-edged
principles. (McLaren, A
New Kind of Christian, p. 158) D. A. Carson
answers why the 4. Finally,
if the I can’t
see church history in any other way, except this: ‘semper reformanda’,
continually being lead and taught and guided by the Spirit into new truth. (McLaren, A Generous Orthodoxy,
p. 193) It is our
turn to step up and take responsibility for who the church is going to be for
a new generation. It is our turn to redefine and reshape and dream it all up
again. (Bell, Velvet
Elvis, p. 164) a) The
spirit of the Reformation was not to find “new truth” but to confirm the
truth of Scripture. Once found, the Reformers were willing to die rather than
change the truth of Scripture. b) The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of Truth Who
guides not into “new truth” but into God’s truth, which is revealed in the
Scriptures (Joh 14:26; 16:13). C. God 1. The
Emerging Church’s thought on God is that God, can’t ever really be an
object to be studied. (McLaren, A New Kind of Christian, p. 161) 2. Historical Orthodox Christianity would
agree that God is transcendent in the sense that an infinite God cannot be
fully known by finite minds and that unless God reveals Himself, man could
never attain knowledge of Him. 3. However, God has revealed Himself in the
Scriptures and in the person of His Son (Heb 1:1-2; Joh 1:18). God has given
us His Spirit that we might know Him and His truth (1Jo 4:7; 5:20; 1Co
2:10-11). D. Sin 1. The
Emerging Church does not appear to make any room for sin being brought into
God’s creation. McLaren
writes, Many of us have grown uneasy with this understanding of ‘the fall’
(and with it an exaggerated understanding of the doctrine of ‘original
sin’). We are suspicious that it has
become a kind of 2. One
gets the idea that McLaren sees all evil stemming not from the fall of man
but from those who believe in original sin (Rom 3:23; 6:23; Rom 5:12). E. Substitutionary
Atonement 1. Take
away the truth of the Bible and it is only a matter of time before the heart
of salvation is questioned. 2. The doctrine of Substitutionary Atonement
is all but ridiculed by the 3. That just sounds like one more injustice
in the cosmic equation. It sounds like divine child abuse. You know? (Brian McLaren, The Story We Find
Ourselves In, p. 102) 4. Substitutionary Atonement is the pinnacle
for understanding the purpose of Christ’s death on the cross on behalf of
sinners (Rom 4:25; 5:8; Gal 2:20; Eph 5:2). F. Salvation 1. The
Emerging Church struggles with any exclusiveness to the Gospel. It would
embrace Universalism (everyone is saved) and reject an exclusive Gospel in
which only those who have the Son are included. Maybe
God’s plan is an opt-out plan, not an opt-in one. If you want to stay out of
the party, you can. But it’s hard for me to imagine somebody being more
stubbornly ornery than God is gracious. (McLaren, The Last Word and the Word After That,
p. 138) 2. Salvation
for the Is getting
individual souls into heaven the focal point of the gospel? I’d have to say
no, for any number of reasons. Don’t you
think that God is concerned about saving the whole world?... It is the
redemption of the world, the stars, the animals, the planets, the whole show. (McLaren, A New Kind of Christian,
p. 129) 3. Furthermore,
the McLaren
comments, Unfortunately, the phrase ‘eternal life’ is often misinterpreted to
mean “life in heaven after you die - as are “ 4. While
it is true that the believer receives life now when he trusts in Christ as
Savior, that life is a spiritually regenerated life through the Holy Spirit
(Joh 5:24). But more importantly, the usage of “eternal life” in the
Scriptures means exactly that, life that is eternal, even after we die and go
to heaven. The Greek words are zōến aiṓnion, and
literally mean, “life which is eternal.” Aiṓnios (eternal)
which literally means, “ages” is quite clear in referring to”life in
heaven after you die” (Joh 6:40; 10:28; Jud 1:7; Jud 1:21; 1Ti 6:16). G. Hell 1. With
a Bible that holds no propositional truths, an all-inclusive gospel, and a
salvation from mistreatment to the earth and its people, how could there be a
belief in hell by the Through
the threat of hell the Pharisees could motivate sinners to stop sinning and
then perhaps God would send the Messiah along with His kingdom. Jesus takes
the Pharisees’ club and turns it on them. Jesus didn’t really believe in or
endorse hell, as we understand it; He just used it as a “truth-depicting
model. (McLaren, The
Last Word and the Word After That, p. 61-64, 71-79) 2. Jesus
was not using a cliché when He spoke of hell, but rather a description of a
literal place where those rejecting Christ’s salvation will experience God’s
eternal wrath (Mar 9:48; Mat 13:42; 25:46). IV. HOW DO WE
RESPOND TO THE EMERGING CHURCH? A. False teachers
had crept in unnoticed (vs. 4) among Jude’s readers. It was such a problem
that Jude was compelled (anágkê - pressed tight, constraint) to
write concerning them. Jude was so compelled to write that he changed his
subject matter from “common salvation” (possibly common blessings in Christ)
to “false teachers.” B. His appeal (parakaléō -
strong encouragement) was that his readers would “contend earnestly” for
the faith. The phrase “contend earnestly” (epagōnízomai) is
an interesting word. 1. It
is only used here in the NT by Jude. 2. It contains the root word agōnízomai
which was an athletic term used for the effort put forth by an Olympian (1Co
9:25 - “compete”). We get our English word, “agonize” from this root. It
was used for a strenuous and heroic struggle with the metaphor, “to fight”
(1Ti 6:12, 2Ti 4:7). 3. Epagōnízomai means to make an emphatic and strenuous
effort on behalf of something. 4. Jude uses epagōnízomai to
appeal to his readers to put forth an emphatic effort and strenuous struggle
on behalf of the truth. Metaphorically, they were to wage war for the truth. C. For what truth
were they to wage war? They were to wage war for the truths and dogma of “the
faith.” 1. “The
faith” (tê pístei) is the Christian faith. It is the objective
beliefs of the Christian faith. 2. This faith was handed down once (hápax
- once for all time cp. Heb 9:28; 1Pe 3:18), meaning that there is one
faith (Eph 4:5) with one set of beliefs. 3. It was handed down for all saints (true
believers) because there is only one set of beliefs that the saints were to
contend for. 4. Jude emphatically describes what “the
faith” really is. In the Greek it is literally, “the once handed down for
the saints faith.” D. Exhortations
From the Scriptures 1. The
believer is to stand in the truth (Eph 6:14). 2. The believer is to discern between truth
and error (1Jo 4:6). 3. The believer is to recognize the earmarks
of false teachers (2Pe 2:1; Jude 4ff). 4. The believer is to speak the truth in
love (Eph 4:15; 2Ti 2:24-26; Tit 1:9). E. Conclusion 1. The
Emerging Church has only one struggle. Their struggle is against those who
claim to have the truth with certainty. The I drive my
car and listen to the Christian radio station, something my wife always tells
me I should stop doing (“because it only gets you upset”). There I hear
preacher after preacher be so absolutely sure of his bombproof answers and
his foolproof biblical interpretations … And the more sure he seems, the less
I find myself wanting to be a Christian, because on this side of the
microphone, antennas, and speaker, life isn’t that simple, answers aren’t
that clear, and nothing is that sure. (McLaren, A New Kind of Christianity, p. 14) “The Bible
requires human interpretation, which was [is] a problem…. How do “I” know the
Bible is always right? And if “I” am
sophisticated enough to realize that I know nothing of the Bible without my
own involvement via interpretation….What good is it, liberals would ask
conservatives, to have an inerrant Bible if you have no inerrant
interpretations?…”
(McLaren, A Generous Orthodoxy, pp. 133-134) 2. The
Emerging Church would have fought against Jude and his readers until Jude and
his readers would have given up contending earnestly for the faith. The Although I
don’t hope all Buddhists will become (cultural) Christians, I do hope all who
feel so called will become Buddhist followers of Jesus; I believe they should
be given that opportunity and invitation. I don’t hope all Jews or Hindus
will become members of the Christian religion. But I do hope all who feel so
called will become Jewish or Hindu followers of Jesus. (McLaren, A Generous Orthodoxy,
p. 113) 3. How
do we respond to the Emerging Church Movement? Answer: the same way the
Scriptures have always exhorted believers to respond, by putting forth an
emphatic effort and strenuous struggle on behalf of the truth, by contending
earnestly for the faith once for all handed down to the saints, and
metaphorically, by waging war for the truth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|