Home

Services

Location

Beliefs

Sermons & Studies

Bible Institute

Calendar

Missions

Pastor

Contact

Search

Weather

 

 

 

Grace Bible Church

4000 E. Collins Rd.   P.O. Box #3762   Gillette, WY  82717   (307) 686-1516

 

“Preaching the Living Word through the Written Word (2Tim 4:2)”

 

 

 

NATURAL AND WILD OLIVE BRANCHES

(Romans 11:16-24)    8/24/08

Grace Bible Church, Gillette, Wyoming

Pastor Daryl Hilbert

 

I.        HOLY ISRAEL WILL NOT BE ABANDONED BY GOD (16)

 

A.      Paul is still arguing that God’s promises to Israel have not failed. He also is arguing that God has not abandoned Israel, thus proving God is a faithful and a covenantal God.

B.      The next argument begins with two illustrations; the first fruits of the harvest and the root and branches.

1.       The first illustration comes from Nu 15:18-21 when God commanded Israel to offer a first fruit of their harvest (and other first fruits - Ex 23:19; 34:26; Le 2:12; 23:10; Nu 18:12, 13; De 18:4). The point was that if the first part was sanctified, made holy, and offered to the Lord, then the entire offering was holy to the Lord.

2.       The second illustration comes from the root and branches of a tree, particularly an olive tree (Ge 8:11 - first mention; De 6:11- flourishing land; 2Ki 5:26 - revenue; Ps 52:8 - symbol of peace). It carries the same idea as the first illustration.

3.       The first fruits and the root refer to the patriarchs of Israel and especially to Abraham. Israel would be the whole lump and the branches.

C.      Paul’s point was that the promises were made to Abraham, who was set apart unto (hágios - made holy or set apart) God, therefore the promises were also made to Abraham’s offspring (Israel). Even though God allowed the rest to be hardened (Ro 11:7b), He would not ultimately abandon Israel, because in Abraham, they also were set apart.

 

II.      NATURAL BRANCHES WERE BROKEN OFF AND WILD BRANCHES WERE GRAFTED IN (17)

 

A.      There is a contrast between the “natural branches,” which is Israel, and the “wild branches,” which are Gentiles.

B.      Some of the natural branches, the ones who were not part of the believing remnant (Ro 11:7a), were “broken off” (vs. 17).

1.       God had warned His people (Israel) of the consequences of idolatry and unbelief (Je 11:16-17; Mt 21:43).

2.       Paul will explain that his analogy is “contrary to nature” (vs. 24) in the sense that grafting is a manipulation of natural processes. It is also contrary to the normal process of grafting because ordinarily a natural branch is grafted into a wild shrub.

3.       The wild branches were grafted into the domestic olive tree and became “partakers” (sugkoinōnós - joint partners) of the rich root.

4.       It is generally agreed that the “root” refers to the patriarchs, especially Abraham (Ro 4:11). It is here where the Gentiles partake of the Abrahamic Covenant (Ge 12:3 cp. Ga 3:6-9).

 

III.   WILD BRANCHES MUST NOT BE ARROGANT (18)

 

A.      Even though Gentiles have been grafted in, Paul commands them not to be arrogant (pres mid imper -katakauchaomai - attitude of superiority. Literally, it is “you must not keep on being arrogant”). Believing Gentiles are not to think of themselves better than Israel.

B.      Paul’s reason is that the root supports the wild branch and not visa versa. It is the commonwealth and promises of Israel of which the Gentiles partake (Ro 11:17; Ep 2:12).

C.      In addition, the Gentiles have no reason to boast in their own salvation because they were charged as sinful (Ro 3:9) and were called by God (Ro 8:28, 30; 9:11, 24-26).

D.      Salvation is from the Lord (Jon 2:9) via the Jewish people (Jn 4:22) and the Gentiles were outsiders who have been brought in (Ep 2:13). In a manner of speaking, the term “wild branches” is a pejorative term.

 

IV.    WILD BRANCHES CAN ALSO BE BROKEN OFF (19-22)

 

A.      Paul anticipates an erroneous Gentile argument that states that Israel was broken off for the purpose that (hína - conjunction, purpose) Gentiles might be grafted in (19).

B.      In one sense, Paul agrees (kalṓs - very well, that is true) for the sake of the argument. Israel was broken off because of their unbelief.

C.      However, believing Gentiles only stand by their belief and not nationality. Therefore, they are no better than the Jews and are not to be conceited (hupsęlà - lofty attitude). Rather they are commanded to “keep on having” godly fear (pres imper - phobéō, fear, Eng. phobia, vs. 20). Previously Paul argued that the purpose for the salvation of the Gentiles was to make Israel jealous (Ro 11:11, 13-14).

D.      Why should Gentiles maintain an attitude of godly fear? Paul argues, if God did not spare the natural branches, there is less chance of Him sparing the wild ones (21). In other words, there is no partiality with God (Ro 2:11) and He will judge righteously with reference to the Jew or Gentile.

E.       God is a righteous God and exercises all of His attributes. He is a kind and merciful God as well as a God of justice with righteous indignation against sin (22).

1.       The believing Gentile has nothing to boast about in his salvation because salvation is through God’s kindness (chrestótęs - gracious attitude, goodness), mercy, and grace.

2.       On the other hand, those from Israel who fell through unbelief are dealt with by God’s severity (apotomía - lit. steep terrain) of justice.

3.       The Gentiles must persevere in their belief (“continue in His kindness”). This does not mean that the believer must maintain his salvation or he will lose it. Rather it means that a genuine believer will continue in his faith and not become apostate. If he does, he was not a true believer and “will be cut off” just like Israel. This is why believing Gentiles must have reverential and godly fear.

 

V.      NATURAL BRANCHES WILL BE GRAFTED IN AGAIN (23-24)

 

A.      It is at this point that Paul returns to his main theme of Israel’s future restoration (23).

B.      Israel’s restoration is predicated on their belief. When Israel recognizes her Messiah, the Lord Jesus Christ, it is at that time that she will be grafted in.

C.      Whether or not this can be done through natural horticulture is beside the point (dead branches cannot be grafted in). For Paul declares, “God is able” to graft them back in a spiritual sense.

D.      In this spiritual sense then, Paul argues that if it was possible for wild branches to be grafted in, it will be easier for the natural branches to be grafted back in (24).

 

VI.    OBSERVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS

 

A.      Arrogance Is Not Wise or Becoming of Believers

B.      God Does All Things For His Glory Not Ours

C.      Do All To The Glory of God